Archive for November, 2010

California San Francisco County Felony Misdemeanor Drunk Driving Injury Conviction Counts Lawyers Attorney

Contact a local lawyer now for a FREE consultation!  

(800)384-5297

DUI Lawyers

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES P. SUBRAMANI, Defendant and Appellant
Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, Division Four
October 31, 1985

The defendant drove his vehicle striking broadside a vehicle injuring the driver and the passenger. Driver suffered minor injuries but passenger sustained substantial injuries. Defendant was charged as follows on V counts, felony driving under the influence and causing injury to the driver (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a)); felony driving under the influence and causing injury to the passenger (§ 23153, subd. (a)); felony driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or more and causing injury to the driver (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (b)); felony driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or more and causing injury to the passenger (§ 23153, subd. (b)) and misdemeanor driving with a suspended license. Prior to trial, defendant pleaded guilty to count V. Defendant was convicted of both felony and misdemeanor driving under the influence and driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or more based upon one collision in which two persons were injured. The defendant challenged the judgment.

Issues:

Whether the misdemeanor drunk driving counts must be vacated?
Whether the defendant is being properly charged with more than one count from a single act of drunk driving which caused injury to more than one person?

Discussion:

This court held that the defendant could be charged only with one count of felony drunk driving (i.e., with violations of subds. (a) and (b) of § 23153); the injuries of either or both of the victims could be used as proof of the charge. Here, however, the prosecutor charged separate felony counts for each victim; that was improper. Because the felony convictions involving injury to victim Blackwell (counts II and IV) were properly charged and are supported by substantial evidence, they can stand. The misdemeanor counts (counts I and III) involving Brown are mere surplusage and therefore must be stricken.

This court held that while such dual conviction is proper, dual punishment is prohibited by Penal Code section 654. (People v. Duarte, supra, 161 Cal.App.3d at pp. 446-447.) The trial court correctly applied that principle by ordering that the execution of the sentence on one of the felonies (count IV) was to be stayed in accordance with Penal Code section 654.

Conclusion:

This court hence reversed the judgment against defendant only as to the misdemeanor convictions and affirmed the judgment in all other respects. Defendant was properly charged and convicted of felonies for both driving under the influence and driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or more.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content

 

Originally published here.


Atchuthan Sriskandarajah

Sherrif’s Dept. Receives Grant Money to Stop Drunk Driving

Sherrif’s Dept. Receives Grant Money to Stop Drunk Driving

NHTSA says a person is killed every 45 minutes by a drunk driver.

Published Nov 23, 2010.
Read more: San Diego 6

A Drunk Driving Attorney May Be Able to Help You Keep Your License

A drunk driving attorney with years of experience is your lucky charm if you’ve been busted by the law for a DUI. This serious offense can be handled brilliantly by a specialized defense attorney who will protect all of your rights and knows exactly how to work effectively within the system.

Attorneys that don’t specialize in DUIs, do not have a good reputation, don’t have experience with DUI cases, or aren’t local to the area where you have been arrested are not an ideal DUI attorney. In fact, you would probably be better off representing yourself, and that’s not saying much, is it?

When you get arrested for a DUI, you either step up and realize that you have to hire a good defense attorney or do nothing and the judge is going to have a field day with you. Like it or not, that is the way the system works and is set up to work. Remember when O.J. Simpson got off when it was fairly obvious that he most likely committed those two murders? Why did he get off? Because he had great defense attorneys who planted the seeds of doubt in the juries heads and painted the arresting officers in a negative light.

Good DUI lawyers are trained to do the exact same things and they do so in criminal courts day in and day out. Over the years some of these defense attorneys will build up a reputation as being superb, it’s this type of seasoned lawyer that you want on your side when you stand in front of a judge and jury.

Skilled drunk driving attorneys know how to work the system. They have specialized knowledge of the law regarding illegal interrogation, denial of counsel, search and seizure, due process under the law, mistakes in field sobriety testing, and specialize in scientifically refuting breath and blood samples.

These specialized attorneys are great at what they do, and hiring a good one almost assures you a lesser sentence and a potential complete dismissal of your DUI case. Sure, these lawyers cost a bit of money, but wouldn’t you rather keep your driver’s license and not have an ugly misdemeanor or felony DUI on your record? Wouldn’t you rather stay out of jail completely and pay a much smaller fine? It’s your choice, but the only realchoice seems clear enough.

The prosecution has to wade through lots of documentation in a DUI case, documentation that if found to be incorrect or wrongly assembled, will cause the case to be dismissed on such a technicality. Your attorney is trained to sniff out these types of technicalities in the police reports, the in the computer automated dispatch reports, on the calibration logs, or perhaps in audio and video taken during the arrest. During the legal discovery period your defense attorney will scrutinize and pick apart all of these reports in order to find something which paints the D.A.’s case in a bad light. Great drunk driving attorneys are like blood hounds in finding these types of discrepancies. In fact, the law is set up to protect the innocent, so there are many, many of these types of errors just waiting to be found. However, the only way to find them is with a top notch drunk driving attorney, somebody with an excellent reputation and years of experience.

Finding and hiring one of these professionals greatly tips the odds in your favor, so go interview a few and get started, don’t delay.

Originally published here.


steve magill